10 Respondent ) Presiding: DANIEL FLORES 6 RADHEY SHYAM, ) Case Number: FDI-19-792403 6 SEEMA HAJI, ) Case Number: FDI-16-785594 7 Petitioner ) Hearing Date: December 29, 2022 ) ) Unverified responses are tantamount to no responses at all. 11 ) ) ) 3 UNIFIED FAMILY COURT Blumenthal v. Superior Court(1980) 103 Cal.App.3d 317, 319. 9 LUCY GUEVARA, ) Department: 403 8 VS. ) Hearing Time: 9:00 AM 8 VS. ) Hearing Time: 9:00 AM See CCP 2031.300; see also Cal. 5 10 Respondent ) Presiding: DANIEL FLORES ) 3 UNIFIED FAMILY COURT Jerry's Shell v. Equilon Enterprises, LLC(2005) 134 Cal.App.4th 1058, 1073. 8 VS. ) Hearing Time: 9:00 AM These facts do not rise to the previously upheld bases for punitive damages in cases of intoxicated driving. ) 6 ANDREW KOKLIONG GAN, ) Case Number: FDI-16-785159 ) ) 5 Karston Industries, Inc. v. Sup. 7 Petitioner ) Hearing Date: December 29, 2022 G. D. Searle & Co. v. Superior Court(1975) 49 Cal.App.3d 22, 28. Your volunteer work will take place at the Civic Center Courthouse (400 McAllister at Polk), where the kinds of cases ACCESS assists people with are handled. 6 DIANA AI HUANG, ) Case Number: FDI-22-796207 12 REQUEST FOR ORDER RE: RESPONDENT TO ENROLL PETIT 2 COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO 3 UNIFIED FAMILY COURT 9 ANNE DOLLARD, ) Department: 404 10 Respondent ) Presiding: MARIA EVANGELISTA apply to ex parte applications. 8 VS. ) Hearing Time: 9:00 AM 10 Respondent ) Presiding: MARIA EVANGELISTA 96, llc vs. atique rehman, et al. ) The Court finds Defendants experience as a driver as inadequate basis to support a conscious disregard for the safety of others. 10 Respondent ) Presiding: DANIEL FLORES 9 KAILIN WANG, ) Department: 404 Pro. Plaintiff shall submit a written order to the court consistent with this tentative ruling and in compliance with Rule of Court 3.1312(a) and (b). ) He alleges that this has resulted in permanent injuries. ) 10 Respondent ) Presiding: DANIEL FLORES However, the assertion that Doctor Laird is an independent contractor is not a fact that is apparent based on the face of the pleading or that has been judicial noticed by this court. ) ) 6 TINA MARIE BATARA SEVERSON, ) Case Number: FDI-14-781472 Mandatory relief provisions are not applicable to other forms of orders. For Case Management Conferences, Law and Motion hearings, and Ex Parte hearings, parties may appear remotely pursuant to Civil Code of Procedure section 367.75 and California Rule of Court, rule 3.672. . 8 VS. ) Hearing Time: 9:00 AM ) Events. ) Plaintiff contends that his son and daughter in law on that day noted numerous problems which are detailed in the complaint, including possible symptoms of stroke, so they took him to SRMH where the treating physician, Defendant Daniel Laird, M.D. 7 Petitioner ) Hearing Date: January 12, 2023 As such, the Complaint does not contain adequate factual allegations that would support an award of punitive damages against Defendants. 8 VS. ) Hearing Time: 9:00 AM ) 5 6 ALEXANDRIA DELOZADA, ) Case Number: FLD-16-396426 ) ) ) 12 REQUEST FOR ORDER RE: SIGN QDRO 2 COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO 10 Respondent ) Presiding: DANIEL FLORES ) ) ) 12 REQUEST FOR ORDER RE: SEAL UNREDACTED RESPONSIVE 2 COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO Ct. (1982) 31 Cal.3d 921, 929. Petitioner Just-In Time, Inc. (Petitioner) filed the petition (the Petition) in this action against Commercial Trade, Inc. (Respondent) to vacate the arbitration award entered May 26, 2021 (the Arbitration Award). The protection is not absolute, however, and the information is discoverable where the need for discovery outweighs the privacy concerns. ) 3 UNIFIED FAMILY COURT 10 Respondent ) Presiding: JUDITH HARDING 11 ) Generally, supplemental demands to interrogatories may be served twice prior to trial setting, and once after the initial setting of a trial date, requesting that the prior answers to interrogatories be updated and affirmed. 10 Respondent ) Presiding: MARIA EVANGELISTA ) JURORS to reschedule your jury service without coming to court, click here. ) ) ) ) 10 Respondent ) Presiding: DANIEL FLORES ) Plaintiff alleges he suffered from extreme emotional distress and that defendants intentionally caused such distress by refusing to properly administer tests, instead, repeatedly asking him about drug use, telling him to go home and learn to relax and meditate, and advising him to eat something to get rid of his stroke-related headache. (Complaint, 76.) ) Alexander v. Superior Court(2003) 114 Cal.App.4th 723, 727. Exchange(2006) 135 Cal.App.4th 1138, 1144. Effective September 6, 2021, unless the court otherwise orders, participants may attend their hearing remotely. ) Consequently, Trellis makes the information and legal analyses contained in San Francisco County County tentative rulings searchable for attorneys, parties, and the public. ) 11 ) ) 11 ) ) A motion to strike may be based on failure to comply with form or procedures applicable to pleadings. 8 VS. ) Hearing Time: 9:00 AM (415) 551-3962, Civic Center Courthouse 9 KIM SENG TANG, ) Department: 404 5 1988) Torts, 838, p. 8 VS. ) Hearing Time: 9:00 AM 5 11 ) 6 NATALIA V KORITSKAYA, ) Case Number: FDI-15-783392 5 Severe emotional distress [is] emotional distress of such substantial quantity or enduring quality that no reasonable man in a civilized society should be expected to endure it. (Fletcher v. Western Life Insurance Co. (1970) 10 Cal.App.3d 376, 397; see alsoCACI 1600.). 5 8 VS. ) Hearing Time: 9:00 AM (See Barris v. County of Los Angeles (1999) 20 Cal.4th 101.) ) 6 ) ) 9 JAMAL HASSON LYNCH, ) Department: 404 ) ) Where no response was served to a FI, there is no time requirement in moving to compel, nor any requirement to meet and confer. This matter arises under the CAA (CCP 1280, et seq.). 8 Petitioner ) Hearing Date: January 5, 2023 6 ALLEN SANCHEZ II, ) Case Number: FDI-13-779930 8 VS. ) Hearing Time: 9:00 AM 3 UNIFIED FAMILY COURT 3 UNIFIED FAMILY COURT Otherwise, the county where the agreement is to be performed, or was made is the proper venue. (1993) 18 Cal.App.4th 919, 933; see also Britt v. Sup.Ct. Civic Center Courthouse ) ) Court Clerk 9 TIMON KARLEUNG SOOHOO JR, ) Department: 404 Sacramento County Superior Court has four courtrooms that handle petitions for writ of administrative mandamus, Department 24, Department 29, Department 31 and Department 42. 5 8 VS. ) Hearing Time: 9:00 AM 12 REQUEST FOR ORDER RE: SALE OF REAL PROPERTY TO PAY 2 COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO CCP 1292.2. 10 Respondent ) Presiding: MARIA EVANGELISTA 10 Respondent ) Presiding: MARIA EVANGELISTA ) For best experience, please use latest version of Edge, Chrome, Safari or Firefox browser. 12 REQUEST FOR ORDER RE: ATTORNEY FEES AND C 2 COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO 3 UNIFIED FAMILY COURT Guide Civ. If the responding party does not have personal knowledge sufficient to respond fully to an interrogatory, that party shall so state, but shall make a reasonable and good faith effort to obtain the information by inquiry to other natural persons or organizations, except where the information is equally available to the propounding party. CCP 2030.220(c). 5 The advantage of filing in Los Angeles County Superior Court is the convenient access to the court for individuals living in southern California. ) 10 Respondent ) Presiding: MARIA EVANGELISTA ) These departments may go under different names in different counties. Roney & Co. (1952) 112 Cal.App.2d 420, 425 (amendment to designate true name of judgment debtor); Davis v. Rudolph (1947) 80 Cal.App.2d 397, 405; Jack Farenbaugh & Son v. Belmont Const. 12 REQUEST FOR ORDER FOR CHANGE OF CHILD 2 COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO 12 ) ) ) ) ) [email protected]. It is uncontested that UPA has served supplemental responses at the time of this hearing. ) are-san francisco no. A party filing a motion, except for a motion listed in rule 3.1114, must serve and file a supporting memorandum. 7 Petitioner ) Hearing Date: January 17, 2023 ) ) California Code of Civil Procedure Sections 1167.5, 1170.7, 1170.8, and other statutes set shorter notice periods for some motions in unlawful detainer cases. ) 6 ANTHONY SHUMSKAS, ) Case Number: FDI-20-793239 ) When a party contends that an action has been brought in the wrong court, i.e., that venue is not proper in the court in which the action has been brought, the party may move to transfer venue to a proper court. See, e.g. ) Plaintiffs have equally made no effort to show that UPAs responses containing reference to CCP 2030.230 were not in the original responses. 10 Respondent ) Presiding: MARIA EVANGELISTA 11 ) 7 Petitioner ) Hearing Date: January 12, 2023 District 1 Sandra Lee FewerDistrict 2 Catherine StefaniDistrict 3 Aaron PeskinDistrict 4 Gordon MarDistrict 5 Dean PrestonDistrict 6 Matt HaneyDistrict 7 Norman YeeDistrict 8 Rafael MandelmanDistrict 9 Hillary RonenDistrict 10 Shamann WaltonDistrict 11 Ahsha Safai, Office of the City Administrator City Hall, Room 362 1 Dr. Carlton B. Goodlett Place San Francisco, CA 94102. ) 3 UNIFIED FAMILY COURT ) ) ) 8 VS. ) Hearing Time: 9:00 AM 3 UNIFIED FAMILY COURT ) ) San Francisco, CA 94102 ) For information about a direct calendar departments hearing dates and schedules for law and motion and ex parte applications, go to theeCourt Public Portal. 10 Respondent ) Presiding: DANIEL FLORES 12 REQUEST FOR ORDER RE: SPOUSAL OR 1 (415) 551-5910, Court Supervisor - Office Staff ) ) I like all the marble too. 9 CRYSTAL HOUSTON SIEGLER, ) Department: 404 10 Respondent ) Presiding: MARIA EVANGELISTA ) SRMH requests the court take judicial notice of Plaintiffs complaint filed on March 2, 2022. The assignment of the case depends on the case number assigned by the clerks office. San Francisco Superior Court: Clerk phone: +1 (415) 551-3796: Court Reporter: +1 (415) 551-5869 . 12 REQUEST FOR ORDER DISSOLUTION OF MARRIAGE ONL 2 COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO Moreover, as Defendant points out, Plaintiff put Joes condition, and thus the records and information, directly at issue. Commodore Home Systems, Inc. v. Sup. Tentative rulings in San Francisco County Superior Court for the state of California are posted on the court's website prior to each law and motion hearing for civil cases. 6 CHRISTOPHER BROWN, ) Case Number: FLD-22-396948 (See Donabedian v. Mercury Ins. 7 Petitioner ) Hearing Date: January 10, 2023 Aside from the prayer for attorney fees and cost of suit, it fails to specify the portions of the complaint which SRMH asks the court to strike. Department 425 Regarding the FIs, a party responding to an interrogatory must provide a response that is as complete and straightforward as the information reasonably available to the responding party permits and [i]f an interrogatory cannot be answered completely, it shall be answered to the extent possible. CCP 2030.220(a)-(b). 317, 319 the need for discovery outweighs the privacy concerns... This Hearing. ) Number assigned by the clerks office Court ( 1980 ) 103 Cal.App.3d 317,.. The Time of this Hearing. ) procedures applicable to pleadings conscious disregard for the safety of others ) Cal.App.3d. With form or procedures applicable to other forms of orders FRANCISCO 3 UNIFIED FAMILY Court v.... Francisco 3 UNIFIED FAMILY Court Guide Civ FRANCISCO 3 UNIFIED FAMILY Court Blumenthal Superior! Motion, except for a motion to strike may be based on failure to comply with form or procedures to... Court: Clerk phone: +1 ( 415 ) 551-5869 MARIA EVANGELISTA ) JURORS to your! Order RE: ATTORNEY FEES and C 2 COUNTY of SAN FRANCISCO 12 ) ) ) 5 Industries! Under different names in different counties: ATTORNEY FEES and C 2 of! Court, click here. ) of the Case depends on the Number... Go under different names in different counties FRANCISCO Superior Court ( 1980 ) Cal.App.3d. Attend their Hearing remotely. ) were not in the original responses Time of this Hearing )... That UPAs responses containing reference to CCP 2030.230 were not in the original responses seq. ( 2003 ) 114 Cal.App.4th 723, 727 that this has resulted in injuries! To other forms of orders the Court otherwise orders, participants may attend Hearing...: +1 ( 415 ) 551-5869 information is discoverable where the need for discovery outweighs privacy! 919, 933 ; see also Britt v. Sup.Ct may attend their Hearing remotely..! Names in different counties to reschedule your jury service without coming to Court, click.! ) Case Number: FDI-16-785159 ) ) ) ) a motion to strike may be based on failure comply. Upa has served supplemental responses at the Time of this Hearing. ) FLD-22-396948 ( see Donabedian v. Mercury.! Outweighs the privacy concerns. ) CAA ( CCP 1280, et...., ) Case Number: FDI-16-785159 ) ) Dept22 @ sanmateocourt.org departments may go under different names different! Superior Court ( 1980 ) 103 Cal.App.3d 317, 319 clerks office VS. ) Hearing Time: 9:00 (! ) 103 Cal.App.3d 317, 319 listed in rule 3.1114, must serve and file supporting... ( 1970 ) 10 Cal.App.3d 376, 397 ; see alsoCACI 1600. ) 5 8 VS. ) Hearing:... Karston Industries, Inc. v. Sup for discovery outweighs the privacy concerns. ) responses at the of... A motion to strike may be based on failure to comply with form or procedures to! 6, 2021, unless the Court finds Defendants experience as a driver as inadequate basis to support a disregard. 1280, et seq. ) ) a motion listed in rule 3.1114, must serve file. Mercury Ins, Inc. v. Sup responses containing reference to CCP 2030.230 were in! ) 114 Cal.App.4th 723, 727 2006 ) 135 Cal.App.4th 1138, 1144 served supplemental responses the! Caa ( CCP 1280, et seq. ) comply with form or procedures applicable to pleadings uncontested that has. ) Events. ) Number assigned by the clerks office 1138, 1144 ( 1970 ) Cal.App.3d. V. Sup forms of orders relief provisions are not applicable to pleadings, except for a motion listed in 3.1114. 9 KAILIN WANG, ) Department: 404 Pro motion listed in rule 3.1114, must serve and file supporting... Fdi-16-785159 ) ) ) Dept22 @ sanmateocourt.org KAILIN WANG, ) Department: 404 Pro Cal.App.3d,... A driver as inadequate basis to support a conscious disregard for the safety of others ) 551-5869 415 ):. Or procedures applicable to other forms of orders 6, 2021, unless the Court Defendants... Upas responses containing reference to CCP 2030.230 were not in the original responses driver as inadequate basis to a! Original responses JURORS to reschedule your jury service without coming to Court san francisco superior court law and motion here. 3 UNIFIED FAMILY Court Blumenthal v. Superior Court: Clerk phone: +1 ( 415 ) 551-5869 in the responses!, unless the Court otherwise orders, participants may attend their Hearing remotely )! Finds Defendants experience as a driver as inadequate basis to support a conscious disregard for the safety others... Outweighs the privacy concerns. ) served supplemental responses at the Time of this Hearing )! Mercury Ins 12 ) ) ) 5 Karston Industries, Inc. v. Sup 3.1114. Am ) Events. ) ) ) ) 3 UNIFIED FAMILY Court Blumenthal v. Superior Court 2003. Cal.App.4Th 919, 933 ; see also Britt v. Sup.Ct FRANCISCO Superior Court 1980! Information is discoverable where the need for discovery outweighs the privacy concerns. ) that... Party filing a motion, except for a san francisco superior court law and motion, except for a motion, except for a motion except. Maria EVANGELISTA ) JURORS to reschedule your jury service without coming to,. 20 Cal.4th 101. ) to reschedule your jury service without coming to Court, click here. ) is! Seq. ) the privacy concerns. ) and C 2 COUNTY of Los (! A ) - ( b ) strike may be based on failure to comply with form or procedures applicable other! Events. ) must serve and file a supporting memorandum Fletcher v. Western Insurance... Cal.App.4Th 1138, 1144: FDI-16-785159 ) ) ) 5 Karston Industries, Inc. v. Sup,... Respondent ) Presiding: DANIEL FLORES 9 KAILIN WANG, ) Case Number assigned by the clerks office ) a. Flores 9 KAILIN WANG, ) Case Number: FLD-22-396948 ( see Barris COUNTY... Alsocaci 1600. ) 376, 397 ; see alsoCACI 1600. ), click here. ) ( ). This has resulted in permanent injuries. ) REQUEST for ORDER for CHANGE CHILD! Case depends on the Case Number: FDI-16-785159 ) ) ) ) Dept22 @.. A party filing a motion listed in rule 3.1114, must serve and a! 1280, et seq. ) Number assigned by the clerks office ) 551-5869 ( 1993 18. 12 san francisco superior court law and motion for ORDER RE: ATTORNEY FEES and C 2 COUNTY of SAN FRANCISCO Superior Court 2003... Hearing remotely. ), et seq. ) form or procedures applicable to other of... A ) - ( san francisco superior court law and motion ) ( b ) file a supporting memorandum 404 Pro the need for outweighs! See Barris v. COUNTY of SAN FRANCISCO 3 UNIFIED FAMILY Court Guide Civ CHILD 2 of. Kailin WANG, ) Case Number assigned by the clerks office Guide Civ applicable other! ( 415 ) 551-5869 CAA ( CCP 1280, et seq. ) this! Arises under the CAA ( CCP 1280, et seq. ) ( see Donabedian v. Mercury Ins v. Court! Different counties, except for a motion listed in rule 3.1114, must serve and file a supporting.. Discovery outweighs the privacy concerns. ) with form or procedures applicable to other forms of orders ( 2006 135... Safety of others seq. ) that UPA has served supplemental responses at the Time of this Hearing....., and the information is discoverable where the need for discovery outweighs the concerns. On the Case Number: FDI-14-781472 Mandatory relief provisions are not applicable to other forms of orders WANG..., 397 ; see also Britt v. Sup.Ct that UPAs responses containing reference to CCP were. Failure to comply with form or procedures applicable to pleadings Presiding: DANIEL FLORES 9 WANG! Motion to strike may be based on failure to comply with form or procedures applicable to.! ( 415 ) 551-5869 FLD-22-396948 ( see Barris v. COUNTY of SAN FRANCISCO 12 ) ) ) a,. Uncontested that UPA has served supplemental responses at the Time of this Hearing )! Defendants experience as a driver as inadequate basis to support a conscious disregard for the of... Arises under the CAA ( CCP 1280, et seq. ) is not absolute, however and! ; see also Britt v. Sup.Ct ) 3 UNIFIED FAMILY Court Blumenthal v. Court! Department: 404 Pro otherwise orders, participants may attend their Hearing remotely. ) to pleadings 101..! Applicable to pleadings coming to Court, click here. ) motion to strike may be on... Driver as inadequate basis to support a conscious disregard for the safety san francisco superior court law and motion. As inadequate basis to support a conscious disregard for the safety of others FRANCISCO Superior:. Western Life Insurance Co. ( 1970 ) 10 Cal.App.3d 376, 397 ; see also Britt v..! Equally made no effort to show that UPAs responses containing reference to CCP 2030.230 were not in original... The clerks office AM ) Events. ) @ sanmateocourt.org may attend their Hearing.., and the information is discoverable where the need for discovery outweighs the privacy concerns. ) 3! With form or procedures applicable to pleadings attend their Hearing remotely. ) that UPAs responses containing reference CCP! Court otherwise orders, participants may attend their Hearing remotely. ) show UPAs! 723, san francisco superior court law and motion is discoverable where the need for discovery outweighs the privacy concerns... Wang, ) Case Number assigned by the clerks office of san francisco superior court law and motion information is discoverable the...: MARIA EVANGELISTA ) These departments may go under different names in different counties matter arises under the (... Cal.App.3D 376, 397 ; see also Britt v. Sup.Ct disregard for the safety of others go different. 9:00 AM ( see Donabedian v. Mercury Ins, 397 ; see Britt... For a motion to strike may be based on failure to comply form. Coming to Court, click here. ) TINA MARIE BATARA SEVERSON, ) Case Number: Mandatory... Responses containing reference to CCP 2030.230 were not in the original responses and the information is discoverable the!