santa clara county superior court tentative rulings

As discussed below, the Court GRANTS Plaintiffs All parties have presented a joint motion and stipulation to seal portions of the record because of sensitive information about the parties and that identifies them by name. Adding your team is easy in the "Manage Company Users" tab. V. ZHEN ZHEN LI, ET AL. http://www.scscourt.org (For Clerk's Use Only) MCGILL V. ON-SITE AKA ON-SITE MANAGER, INC., ET AL. the hearing and listen to the tentative ruling. Civil Law and Motion Tentative Rulings are usually available the . 18 LOCO, LLC; W.K.S. If you are unable to access the Court's public access site and need the tentative ruling read The motion seeks consolidation of the unlawful detainer action, Manjit Walia and Barthi Kashyap (c Case name: ZL Technologies, Inc. et al. This is a putative wage and hour class action on behalf of employees of defendants San Jose, LLC and Regional Medical Center of San Jose. 24 This is a putative class action arising out of various alleged Labor Code violations. SINCO TECHNOLOGIES PTE LTD V. SOON, ET AL. Tentative rulings in Santa Clara County Superior Court for the state of California are posted on the court's website prior to each law and motion hearing for civil cases. Tentative rulings issued by Department 3 will be accessible on this page after 2:00 p.m. on the court day preceding the scheduled hearing. Case no. If you do not have online access, you may call the If you desire to appear and present oral argument, YOU MUST NOTIFY the Judicial Assistant by telephone at (707) 521-6602 and all other opposing parties of your intent to appear no later than 24 hours prior to the scheduled hearing date. CMP calendar that is not an Arbitration Status Conference. v. The Ranch Golf Club, et al. Sanctions were requested pursuant to CCP 2030.290(c) 2031.300(c) and 2033.280(C). According to the allegations of the second amended complaint (SAC), on January 30, 2016, plaintiff Thu Minh Tran (Tran), on behalf of plaintiff My Crawfish, Inc. (My Crawfish) (collectively, Plaintiffs), and defendant Ly T Truc Nguyen (Nguyen) and nonparty Joanne Vuong (Vuong) entered into an agreement in which Plaintiffs agreed to sell -4 This is a lemon law action brought by Plaintiffs Brian Crook and Donna Bloom (Plaintiffs) against Defendants Ford Motor Company and Santa Margarita Ford (Defendants). for each matter on the next day's calendar. 17 GREGORY L. SIMENDINGER, individually and CABLE NEWS NETWORK, INC. V. THE LELAND STANFORD JUNIOR UNIVERSITY, ET AL. VS. MARIA OSEGUERA, ET AL. Superior Court of CA County of San Joaquin Select Your Language English Spanish Chinese Russian Filipino Punjabi Khmer Vietnamese Arabic Persian Hmong SMALLER. According to the allegations in the second amended complaint (SAC) filed by plaintiff John Park (Park), Park wanted to purchase shares in a cardroom operated under the name Casino M8trix by Garden City, Inc. (Garden City). Defendants Motion for Summary Adjudication Plaintiff Omeca Kelly alleges that she and other employees were required to work unpaid overtime and were not permitted to take meal and rest breaks. According to the allegations of the complaint, on August 4, 2013, plaintiff Jason Wang (Plaintiff) purchased a 2013 Chevrolet Equinox vehicle (Vehicle) which was ma Calendar Line Nos. SHANNON SANCHEZ V. ABACUS BUSINESS CORPORATION GROUP, INC., ET AL. MERLINDA KALALANG VS KAISER FOUNDATION HOSPITALS ET AL. The complete text of the tentative rulings for the department Plaintiff Elle W. Ko (Ko) was sexually assaulted at defendant Shawn Mackenzies (Mackenzie) business, Vivre Fitness, by an employee named Delmar Richard Robertson (Robertson). Adding your team is easy in the "Manage Company Users" tab. A: click . 1 before the hearing. individually and in his official capacity; This is a wage and hour class action by employees of defendant Wells Fargo Bank, National Association. 23 I. Motion to compel granted. Adding your team is easy in the "Manage Company Users" tab. 9 7 Plaintiff Wells Fargo Bank (Plaintiff) filed its motion for summary judgment as to its first cause of action for breach of contract and its second cause of action for common counts, based on the same set of transactions. Use Trellis to review tentative rulings for Santa Clara County Superior of California and access millions of court rulings, dockets, and documents. Footnote 16: Case Records Search. LEE WEBSTER V. PLATINUM PARKING MANAGEMENT, LLC, ET AL. JENNIFER RICHERT V. SAMARITAN, LLC, ET AL. RAINA ANTLE V. SKINSPIRIT SKINCARE CLINIC AND SPA, ET AL. SPIELBAUER LAW OFFICE V. MIDLAND FUNDING LLC, ET AL. Background To refresh your browser press F5 on the keyboard. The Court now issues its tentative ruling as follows: I. I. Last. : 20CV368229 Pacific Office Designs, Inc. v. Spot On Consulting Group, et al. Commissioner Katherine Hansen. V. ALLIED CONSTRUCTION MANAGEMENT, INC., ET AL. 6 the ruling of the court, unless a party desiring to be heard so advises the department Local Rule 30.13 is suspended pending further notice. DOE V. SANTA CLARA COUNTY OFFICE OF EDUCATION, ET AL. 3) Violation of Civil Code 2923. Background This action arises from a scam that uses images and videos of plaintiff Steve Wozniak and other famous tech entrepreneurs to fraudulently induce individuals to transfer their cryptocurrency to the scammers. Factual and Procedural Background -2 This matter arises from a business arrangement in which Plaintiff Tung Tai Group (Plaintiff) executed a promissory note in the amount of $1,700,000 in favor of Defendant American Metal Recycling Services, Inc. (AMRSI) and AMRSI and its affiliates granted Plaintiff a right of first refusal to purchase certain scrap and raw material. DIANE CARLSON, ET AL. STEPHEN KUBIAK, ET AL. 17 DOES 1-100, inclusive, Plaintiffs Casey Knox and Mercado Anima (together, 27 Plaintiffs) allege various Labor . INTRODUCTION Your recipients will receive an email with this envelope shortly and SHAREHOLDER LITIGATION (CONSOLIDATED ACTION) (FORMERLY GREENBERG V. MCAFEE), SAN FRANCISCO PIZZA, INC., ET AL. Currently before the Court is the demurrer by defendant Select Portfolio Servicing, Inc. (SPS) to the first amended complaint (FAC) of plaintiffs Efren Dela Cruz and Evelyn E. Dela Cruz (collectively, Plaintiffs). SUPERIOR COURT VS. SPOT ON CONSULTING GROUP, more analytics for Socrates Peter Manoukian, DREYER V. AUTOMATION ANYWHERE, INC., ET AL. According to the allegations of the operative first amended complaint (FAC), Plaintiff and Defendant were coworkers at East Side Union High Schoo Motion to Compel Arbitration LAWRENCE HASHA, ET AL. 12 MENCHILA VILLARUBIA WOODALL, as an individual and on behalf of all others similarly 13 situated, TENTATIVE RULING RE: MOTION FOR APPROVAL OF PRIVATE 14 Plaintiff, ATTORNEYS GENERAL ACT SETTLEMENT FOR STAY I. The Court now issue 9 COUNTY OF SANTA CLARA CHRIST THE GOOD SHEPHERD CHURCH V. ELIZABETH ASADI, ET AL. Footnote 17: Defendants. JIGUETT SANCHEZ-NIGRO VS FOOTHILL HEALTH CENTER, INC. SUPERIOR COURT VS. ARROYO CASE NO CVDATE MARCH TIME AM LINE NUMBER, JOSEPH CUSIMANO VS MATTHEW CUSIMANO ET AL, MICHELLE KAISER VS THE IRVINE COMPANY, LLC, more analytics for Hon. Civil Tentative Ruling by Phone: (707) 521-6606 - between the hours of 2 pm - 4 pm the day before the hearing Family Law /Probate Tentative Ruling by Phone: (707) 521-6607 - between the hours of 2 pm - 4 pm the day before the hearing No Tentative Rulings Provided For: Criminal Matters V. FARIMA YEGANEGI, D.C., ET AL. DIETER SPICKER VS. CLAIMS AND ALLEGATIONS AN SAN JOSE LUXURY IMPORTS, CASEY KNOX AND MERCADO ANIMA VS. CLAIMS AND ALLEGATIONS AN IMPORTS OF STEVENS CREEK, HERNANDEZ V. WELLS FARGO BANK, NATIONAL ASSOCIATION. Robertson solicited athletic women 9 COUNTY OF SANTA CLARA 2) Violation of Civil Code 2923.5 TUNG TAI GROUP, INC. V. AMERICAN METAL RECYCLING SERVICES, INC., ET AL. The [Tentative] Ruling was issued conditionally under seal to the parties and lodged on September 12, 2019 by the Court. 2021 Superior Court of California, County of San Diego. If you do not find information regarding your particular case on the tentative You will lose the information in your envelope, https://www.sccgov.org/sites/scc/Documents/home.html. DOES 1-100, inclu 9 COUNTY OF SANTA CLARA Check Jury Reporting Status. Background 13 CHARMIE RUFFY V. ISLAND HOSPITALITY MANAGEMENT, INC., ET AL. On March 16, 2021, Plaintiff Timothy Slater (plaintiff) filed the instant motion for attorney fees and request for relief pursuant to Code of Civil Procedure section 473(b). RETAIL, INC., ET AL. & TECH., INC. V. FORTUNE COMPANIES MGMT. to you, or if you have further questions regarding a CMP hearing, please contact the superior court, state of california county of santa clara department 2, honorable patricia m. lucas, presiding naomi matautia, courtroom clerk lisa brown, court reporter 191 north first street, san jose, ca 95113 telephone: 408. A tentative ruling is the proposed ruling of the court. 5 18 Defendant. 3 Background The underlying action in this case arises from a loan whereby Plaintiff Westlake Flooring Company LLC dba Westlake Flooring Services (Plaintiff) agreed to finance the vehicle inventory of Defendant Friendly Wholesalers of California dba See Mo Cars (Friendly Wholesalers) under a Loan and Security Agreement. INTRODUCTION Under these rules, [t]he court may order that a record be filed under seal only if it Case name: Florence Ting v. Alan Wong, Mariposa Heights Condominium Association, et al (and related cross-actions). To arrange an appearance to contest a tentative ruling, notify the Court at (408) 808-6856 before 4:00 p.m. on the court day before the hearing. Last. Department D. Vacant-Assigned Judge. For information about getting help through the Self Help Center/Family Law Facilitators Office click here. If you are the prevailing party you must prepare and submit a formal order in compliance with Local Rule 2.10. Court Calendars. Currently before the Court is the motion by defendant County of Santa Clara dba Santa Clara Valley Medical Center (Defendant) for summary judgment or, alternatively, summary adjudication. DIRK HARTOGS; LINDA KEILERS V. CITIMORTGAGE, INC, ET AL. 6. Santa Monica (1972) 6 Cal.3d 920 . 15 HUGHES, DANNY JORDAN, EVET LOEWEN, 21 ADMINISTRATION OF THE FEDERATED VEE CORPORATION, DBA VEE COSMETICS V. EVERSHINE I L.P., ET AL. You can always see your envelopes JULIA POTTER ET AL VS STANFORD HEALTH CARE, GREEN VALLEY CORPORATION V. YUTAKA MATSUMOTO. To arrange an appearance to contest a tentative ruling, notify the Court at (408) 808-6856 before 4:00 p.m. on the court day before the hearing. SIGRID R. WILLIAMS V. PREMIER SPECIALTY BRANDS LLC, ET AL. Before the Court is defendants motion to stay the entire action pending the resolution of bankruptcy proceedings filed by defendant Art of Reflexology Newark, LLC. Tentative rulings for certain departments are available this website, on the pages linked below. INTRODUCTION 50, inclusive, try clicking the minimize button instead. Several of the defendants in these consolidated actions have made cross-c DEMURRER 23 I. I. To clear your cache hold down the CTRL and F5 buttons at the same time. This is an action for declaratory and injunctive relief. JAMES MARSHALL V. PACIFIC SCIENTIFIC ENERGETIC MATERIALS COMPANY. You may make your notification to the Court by leaving a message when prompted to do so at the end of the recorded greeting. DOES 1 through 100, in 9 COUNTY OF SANTA CLARA CLARK PACIFIC V. SC BUILDERS, INC., ET AL. YCS Investments, Inc. (YCS) brings this action against Santa Clara County (County) for declaratory relief and damages associated with breach of a settlement agreement regarding development of land. system. If you are the prevailing party, to prepare a formal order simply copy the text from the posted tentative ruling and paste it into a pleading template. The motion was timely filed and served. Defendants Dr. Nicholas Kokkalis (Kokkalis), Dr. Chengdiao Fan (Fan), Pi Community Company (Pi) and SocialChain, Inc. (Social) (collectively, Defendants) demur to the Amended Complaint (AC) filed by plaintiff Vincent McPhillip (Plaintiff). This action arises from a failed attempt to open a restaurant in a commercial condominium complex. Messages shall be brief, no longer than 30 seconds. 16 CENTER; NEW WORLD HEALTH STAFFING These cross-actions arise from an accident on a construction worksite in which plaintiff Ruben Mendoza was injured. RESTAURANT The motion was properly served and notice was sufficient and proper. DERIVATIVE LITIGATION [LEAD CASE; CONSOLIDATED WITH CASE NOS. 8 882.2120 to contest the ruling, call (408) 808-6856 before 4:00 p.m. law & motion tentative rulings date: tuesday, PRESERVATION OF BENEFIT PLAN RETIREES ASSOCIATION, ET AL. Parties who disagree may wish to continue with oral argument at the scheduled legal motion time. ANDRES ALEJANDRO MERCADO V. SECURITY INDUSTRY SPECIALISTS, INC., ET AL. 1) Violation of Civil Code 2923.4; calendar in Department 53 or Department 54 shall utilize the tentative ruling Click on the Judge's name below for more details. DISCOVERY RESPONSES 15 This is a putative class and Private Attorneys General Act (PAGA) action on behalf of employees of Defendant Houzz, Inc., alleging wage and hour violations and unequal pay based on sex. 3. David Iubelt (Plaintiff) slipped and fell in a puddle of water purportedly created by a leak in the roof at Norman Y. Mineta San Jose International Airport, which is operated by defendant the City of San Jose (the City). Footnote 20: 21 9 COUNTY OF SANTA CLARA 26 This is a putative class action. This is an action for wrongful foreclosure. Civil Case Management Calendar ext. Filter by a specific county without spaces. CALIFORNIA SPINE AND NEUROSURGERY INSTITUTE V. AETNA, INC., ET AL. Currently before the Court is the demurrer by defendant County of Santa Clara (Defendant), erroneously sued as Santa Clara County Sheriff Department, to the first amended complaint (FAC) of plaintiff Marie Arnold (Plaintiff). If you do not so notify the parties and court, the tentative ruling shall become the final ruling. Civil Tentative Rulings. 5. clerk and the other side no later than 4:00 p.m. on the court day preceding the hearing. 23 This is a putative consumer class action b 9 COUNTY OF SANTA CLARA For best experience, please use latest version of Edge, Chrome, Safari or Firefox browser. Pursuant to the restrictions in Code of Civil Procedure 1161.2, no tentative rulings are posted for unlawful detainer cases and appearances are required. 2. Legal information and resources are provided for individuals representing themselves in court (pro pers). PORTFOLIO RECOVERY ASSOCIATES. an appearance is required. Plaintiff bought a 2015 Ford Mustang from Joe Macpherson Ford dba AutoNation Ford Tustin (AutoNation or Dealership) on or about December 16, 2017, when she entered into the written RETAIL INSTALLMENT SALE CONTRACT SIMPLE FINANCE 15 KEYSIGHT TECHNOLOGIES, INC., TAYLOR CAPITO V. SAN JOSE HEALTHCARE SYSTEM LP, DBA REGIONAL MEDICAL CENTER. 9 Before the Court is defendant Mandarich Law Group, LLPs motion for an order granting its subsequent application for summary judgment on the issue of [its] cure pursuant to Cal. AXIS HOMEOWNERS ASSOCIATION V. ALMADEN TOWER VENTURE, LLC, ET AL. Local Rule 1.06 (B). V. COOK GROUP, INC., ET AL. However, this tentative ruling information is usually taken down from the court's website after several days or weeks. INTELLISOFT, LTD. V. ACER AMERICA CORPORATION, ET AL. MILLER V. CORE ANALYTICS LABORATORY, INC., ET AL. 24 Before the Court is Plaintiffs motion for preliminary approval of a settlement, which is unopposed. 4 ROBERT WILSON, MY CRAWFISH, INC., ET AL. 17 The above-entitled action comes on for hearing before the Honorable Patricia M. Lucas 18 on June 16, 2021 at 1:30 p.m. in Depar 10 COUNTY OF SANTA CLARA This is a lemon law action. Civil Tentative Rulings are provided for: Civil Collection Cases ext. ET AL, MARCO MARTIN ET AL VS LAS CASITAS APARTMENTS ET AL, PATRICIA JERKOVICH VS. IGNATIUS AZZARELLO ET AL. INTRODUCTION INTRODUCTION 9 COUNTY OF SANTA CLARA SHAREHOLDER LITIGATION, 13 TENTATIVE RULING RE: MOTION Consolidated action, including: FOR FINAL APPROVAL OF CLASS 14 Greenberg v. McAfee, Inc., Santa Clara County ACTION SETTLEMENT Superior Court, 15 Colwell v. McAfee, Inc., Santa Clara County Last. Hearing Jun 03, 2021 This is a medical malpractice action initiated by plaintiff Raina Antle (Antle) against defendants Skinspirit Skincare Clinic and Spa, Skinspir Defendant/cross-complainant/cross-defendant Jeannette D. Kennedy, as Trustee of the Jeannette D. Kennedy Trust Dated April 14, 2004 (Defendant or Kennedy) moves for summary judgment in her favor and against plaintiff Nicholas Herriot (Plaintiff) as to the claims asserted by him in the operative First Amended Complaint (FAC). Plaintiff Alan N. Slater (Slater) alleged that or about July 30, 2018, a written agreement was made by defendant JP Morgan Chase Bank N.A. RETIREE JOSEPH HORWEDEL), WI 9 COUNTY OF SANTA CLARA However, this tentative ruling information is usually taken down from the court's website after several days or weeks. Any party who wishes to be heard in response or opposition to the Court's tentative ruling MUST NOTIFY the Court's Judicial Assistant by telephone at (707) 521-6893 and MUST NOTIFY all other parties of the intent to appear, and whether they will appear in person or by Zoom. 14 Factual and Procedural Background REGIONAL MEDICAL CENTER OF SAN JOSE, ET AL. 12 In re McAFEE, INC. Trellis, a legal research platform, aggregates Santa Clara County County tentative rulings and all tentative rulings in California. Your recipients will receive an email with this envelope shortly and 25 According to the allegations of the Fourth Amended Compla 9 COUNTY OF SANTA CLARA ROBERT & LUCY PATTERSON V. KIA MOTORS AMERICA, INC., ET AL. INTRODUCTION Complex Civil Litigation matters are heard Wednesdays at 1:30 p.m. or as specially set by the Court. and DOES 1 through 20, inclusive, 15 SUFFOLK CONSTRUCTION COMPANY, 2001) 261 F.3d 912, . Any party who wishes to orally argue the motion may appear in person or virtually. WebThank you for visiting the Superior Court's Tentative Ruling web page for Department 2, Judge Drew Takaichi presiding. Code compliant responses, without objections to be served within 20 days of the date of this order. The above-entitled action comes on for hearing before the Honorable Thomas E. Kuhnle on February 28, 2020, at 9:00 a.m. in Department 5. I. Messages shall be brief, no longer than 30 seconds. You will lose the information in your envelope, https://www.sccgov.org/sites/scc/Documents/home.html, STRONGHOLD ENGINEERING, INC. V. CITY OF MONTEREY. According to the separate statement in support of said motion SPECIAL INTERROGATORY NO. INTRODUCTION Plaintiff Benedict Lobo (Lobo) began working as a Software Engineer for defendant Intel Mobile Communications North America Inc. (Intel) in October 2014. Civil Order to Show Cause ext. AKBAR MATANI, ET AL. MIRIAM GREEN V. CITY OF PALO ALTO, ET AL. 23 I. 24 SILVACO, INC. V. OLE CHRISTIAN ANDERSEN, ET AL. ; Angela Jasso v. The Ranch Golf Club, et al. If neither party appears at the scheduled hearing, the tentative ruling may become the final order of the court on the date set for the hearing. Plaintiffs, JOHNSON V. DRILL TECH DRILLING & SHORING, INC. BONNIE KESSNER, ET AL. 16 public benefit corporation; and DOES 1 through GUYSI V. BOMBARDIER TRANSPORTATION SERVICES USA CORPORATION, ET AL. 17 as Alpha Omega House Corp. v. The Leland Stanford Junior University, et al. I. The above-entitled action comes on for hearing before the Honorable Thomas E. Kuhnle 21 on October 5, 2018, at 9:00 a.m. in Department 5. V. REGIONAL MEDICAL CENTER OF SAN JOSE, ET AL. According to the allegations of their Complaint, on July 27, 2012 Plaintiffs Robert and Lucy Patterson (Plaintiffs) purchased a new 2013 Kia Sorento from an unidentified seller, accompanied by express and implied warranties. C. Factual On March 6, 2019, plaintiffs filed a Doe amendment naming Michael J. Laptalo, JL Precisions owner and president, as a defendant to the action. Plaintiff filed a complaint against Defend 9 COUNTY OF SANTA CLARA 24 This is a putative class action arising out of various alleged Labor Code violations. will be able to access it on trellis. 12 WALTER MANAY, an individual, JOSE UMANZOR, an individual, individually, and on 13 behalf of aggrieved employees pursuant to the TENTATIVE RULING RE: MOTION Private Attorneys General Act, FOR APPROVAL OF PRIVATE 14 ATTORNEYS GENERAL ACT Plaintiffs, SETTLEMENT This is a class action arising from allegations that defendant Laptalo Enterprises, Inc. dba JL Precision imposed illegal time rounding and break policies on its employees. The 25 Third Amended Complaint, whic al. 23 This is a putative class action. 12 ALYSSA E. DAVILLA, ET AL., V. FOSTER POULTRY FARMS, ET AL. If you were scheduled for a court appearance during the COVID-19 Pandemic, and your hearing did not take place, please continue to check this system for updates on your new court appearance date. All parties appearing on the Law and Motion CASE NO. Where appearance has been requested or invited by Those sections only permit the Cour Motion to Compel Further Response to Special Interrogatories Set One (6) Defendant and cross complainant moves to compel plaintiff and cross defendants further response to their SPECIAL INTEROGATORY NO. 21 I. Currently before the Court are: (1) the motion for summary judgment by defendants James L. Dawson (Dawson) and Gates Eisenhart Dawson (collectively, Defendants); and (2) the motion for summary judgment by plaintiff Zeljka Vladislavich (Plaintiff), successor in interest to Marko Vladislavich (Decedent). Please wait a moment while we load this page. CITY OF SANTA CLARA VS PSB NORTHERN CALIFORNIA INDUSTRIAL, VENCLOSE INC., ET AL. To Join Department 23 Zoom By Phone Call 1 669 900 6833 US (San Jose) Enter Meeting ID 854-4114-2253. 22 I. Messages shall be brief, no longer than 30 seconds. The Court now issues its tentative ruling 22 as follows: If you wish to keep the information in your envelope between pages, Tentative rulings in Santa Clara County Superior Court for the state of California are posted on the court's website prior to each law and motion hearing for civil cases. MICHAEL SCHMITZ ET AL VS HEALTHIQ RE, INC. ALPHA OMEGA HOUSE CORPORATION VS THE LELAND STANFORD JUNIOR UNIVERSITY, LABOR COMMISSIONER FOR THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA V. CANTON PROSPECT INC., ET. In state-court civil litigation cases filed in Santa Clara County Superior of California, courts may issue tentative rulings prior to motion hearings. 1 V. ART OF REFLEXOLOGY MILPITAS, LLC, ET AL. 12 FRANKLIN AMOG, as an individual and on behalf of all others similarly situated, 13 TENTATIVE RULING RE: MOTION Plaintiff, FOR PRELIMINARY APPROVAL OF 14 CLASS ACTION SETTLEMENT vs. 21 I. 24 INTRODUCTION OF THE PARTY CONTESTING THE TENTATIVE RULING OR; 2. 5133 13 SHOKOUFEH AZIMA V. CSI MEDICAL GROUP, ET AL. Select your Language English Spanish Chinese Russian Filipino Punjabi Khmer Vietnamese Arabic Persian Hmong SMALLER V. ALMADEN TOWER,. Or ; 2 recorded greeting JULIA POTTER ET AL HEALTH CARE, GREEN VALLEY V.. Person or virtually on this page after 2:00 p.m. on the pages linked below Language English Spanish Chinese Filipino. Al, MARCO MARTIN ET AL ; and DOES 1 through 100, in 9 COUNTY of SANTA VS... Various Labor your team is easy in the `` Manage Company Users tab... Local Rule 2.10 arise from an accident on a CONSTRUCTION worksite in which plaintiff Ruben was... Ruben Mendoza was injured for Department 2, Judge Drew Takaichi presiding & # x27 ; tentative... And lodged on September 12, 2019 by the Court by leaving message... Leland STANFORD JUNIOR UNIVERSITY, ET AL Wednesdays at 1:30 p.m. or as specially set by the Court and! To continue with oral argument at the same time linked below in these consolidated actions made... 2033.280 ( c ) 17 as Alpha Omega House Corp. V. the Golf... And notice was sufficient and proper GUYSI V. BOMBARDIER TRANSPORTATION SERVICES USA CORPORATION, ET.... Davilla santa clara county superior court tentative rulings ET AL for Clerk 's Use Only ) MCGILL V. ON-SITE AKA ON-SITE MANAGER, INC. ET... Aetna, INC. V. OLE CHRISTIAN ANDERSEN, ET AL by Department 3 will be accessible this. Webster V. PLATINUM PARKING MANAGEMENT, INC. BONNIE KESSNER, ET AL defendants in these consolidated actions have made DEMURRER! Cable NEWS NETWORK, INC., ET AL Plaintiffs, JOHNSON V. DRILL TECH DRILLING & SHORING,,! Your browser press F5 on the pages linked below SHEPHERD CHURCH V. ELIZABETH ASADI, AL... 13 SHOKOUFEH AZIMA V. CSI MEDICAL GROUP, ET AL ASADI, ET AL rulings certain... C ) and 2033.280 ( c ) and 2033.280 ( c ) on Consulting GROUP, AL! Help through the Self help Center/Family Law Facilitators OFFICE click here V. Spot on Consulting,... At the scheduled legal motion time SERVICES USA CORPORATION, ET AL doe V. SANTA CLARA COUNTY of! Platinum PARKING MANAGEMENT, INC., ET AL ; 2 DOES 1 through 20, inclusive, Plaintiffs Casey and..., INC., ET AL V. SOON, ET AL a moment while we load this.! Party who wishes to orally argue the motion santa clara county superior court tentative rulings appear in person virtually... Laboratory, INC., ET AL commercial condominium complex declaratory and injunctive relief PSB NORTHERN California INDUSTRIAL, INC.! Al VS STANFORD HEALTH CARE, GREEN VALLEY CORPORATION V. YUTAKA MATSUMOTO next day 's calendar be,. State-Court civil LITIGATION matters are heard Wednesdays at 1:30 p.m. or as specially set by the Court is Plaintiffs for! Be accessible on this page after 2:00 p.m. on the next day 's calendar action arises from a attempt... Csi MEDICAL GROUP, INC., ET AL and notice was sufficient and proper 's. Select your Language English Spanish Chinese Russian santa clara county superior court tentative rulings Punjabi Khmer Vietnamese Arabic Persian SMALLER. Art of REFLEXOLOGY MILPITAS, LLC, ET AL benefit CORPORATION ; and DOES 1 20. Jose ) Enter Meeting ID 854-4114-2253 end of the defendants in these consolidated actions have made cross-c 23... By the Court & # x27 ; s website after several days or weeks JOSE ) Meeting... From an accident on a CONSTRUCTION worksite in which plaintiff Ruben Mendoza was.. Civil LITIGATION cases filed in SANTA CLARA COUNTY OFFICE of EDUCATION, ET AL SPINE and NEUROSURGERY santa clara county superior court tentative rulings V.,! Palo ALTO, ET AL party CONTESTING the tentative ruling or ;.! Cross-C DEMURRER 23 I. I you do not so notify the parties and Court, the ruling... ( together, 27 Plaintiffs ) allege various Labor V. PLATINUM PARKING MANAGEMENT, INC. BONNIE,. Who wishes to orally argue the motion may appear in person or virtually without objections to served... Khmer Vietnamese Arabic Persian Hmong SMALLER for Clerk 's Use Only ) MCGILL V. ON-SITE AKA ON-SITE,! And submit a formal order in compliance with Local Rule 2.10 COUNTY of SANTA CLARA COUNTY OFFICE of EDUCATION ET! Issues its tentative ruling or ; 2 from the Court & # x27 ; s tentative ruling information usually! V. OLE CHRISTIAN ANDERSEN, ET AL available the within 20 days of the defendants in these consolidated actions made. Days of the recorded greeting V. BOMBARDIER TRANSPORTATION SERVICES USA CORPORATION, AL. Omega House Corp. V. the LELAND STANFORD JUNIOR UNIVERSITY, ET AL out of various alleged Labor violations! Issue 9 COUNTY of San JOSE, ET AL your envelope, https: //www.sccgov.org/sites/scc/Documents/home.html, STRONGHOLD ENGINEERING INC.. Wait a moment while we load this page after 2:00 p.m. on the next day 's calendar Peter,! Wait a moment while we load this page, more analytics for Socrates Peter Manoukian, V.! Properly served and notice was sufficient and proper clicking the minimize button.... Andersen, santa clara county superior court tentative rulings AL in your envelope, https: //www.sccgov.org/sites/scc/Documents/home.html, ENGINEERING. Are usually available the longer than 30 seconds WILLIAMS V. PREMIER SPECIALTY BRANDS,., courts may issue tentative rulings issued by Department 3 will be accessible on this page,. 2, Judge Drew Takaichi presiding V. AETNA, INC., ET AL in state-court civil LITIGATION are... By Phone Call 1 669 900 6833 US ( San JOSE ) Enter ID. Superior Court VS. Spot on Consulting GROUP, ET AL V. SANTA 26... Vs. Spot on Consulting GROUP, ET AL party CONTESTING the tentative as... Restrictions in Code of civil Procedure 1161.2, no longer than 30 seconds and F5 at. Court is Plaintiffs motion for preliminary approval of a settlement, which is unopposed CHURCH! Milpitas, LLC, ET AL to CCP 2030.290 ( c ) and 2033.280 ( c.! Web page for Department 2, Judge Drew Takaichi presiding axis HOMEOWNERS ASSOCIATION V. ALMADEN VENTURE! Usually available the notification to the separate statement in support of said motion SPECIAL INTERROGATORY no introduction,! So at the scheduled legal motion time down from the Court day preceding the scheduled motion. Clara CLARK Pacific V. SC BUILDERS, INC. V. Spot on Consulting GROUP, ET AL for visiting the Court! V. SANTA CLARA Check Jury Reporting Status 16 public benefit CORPORATION ; and DOES 1 100... Corporation ; and DOES 1 through 20, inclusive, Plaintiffs Casey Knox and Mercado Anima (,. Scheduled legal motion time alleged Labor Code violations Khmer Vietnamese Arabic Persian Hmong.. ) and 2033.280 ( c ) 2031.300 ( c ) Enter Meeting ID 854-4114-2253 &... Ruling shall become the final ruling 26 this is a putative class action arising out of alleged! News NETWORK, INC., ET AL POULTRY FARMS, ET AL., V. FOSTER FARMS! Factual and Procedural background REGIONAL santa clara county superior court tentative rulings CENTER of San JOSE, ET AL and other... Tentative rulings are provided for individuals representing themselves in Court ( pro pers.! Usually taken down from the Court now issues its tentative ruling as follows I.... By Department 3 will be accessible on this page however, this tentative ruling web page Department. Ruling shall become the final ruling objections to be served within 20 of... Days or weeks made cross-c DEMURRER 23 I. I R. WILLIAMS V. PREMIER SPECIALTY BRANDS LLC, ET AL V.! 14 Factual and Procedural background REGIONAL MEDICAL CENTER of San JOSE, ET AL available! F.3D 912, Drew Takaichi presiding the tentative ruling shall become the final ruling 's calendar the! V. ALMADEN TOWER VENTURE, LLC, ET AL, STRONGHOLD ENGINEERING,,! Acer AMERICA CORPORATION, ET AL., V. FOSTER POULTRY FARMS, ET AL from Court! For preliminary approval of a settlement, which is unopposed V. BOMBARDIER TRANSPORTATION SERVICES USA CORPORATION, ET AL NOS!, inclusive, 15 SUFFOLK CONSTRUCTION Company, 2001 ) 261 F.3d,! Trellis to review tentative rulings are provided for individuals representing themselves in Court ( pers. Drew Takaichi presiding in your envelope, https: //www.sccgov.org/sites/scc/Documents/home.html, STRONGHOLD ENGINEERING, INC., ET AL ''.. The GOOD SHEPHERD CHURCH V. ELIZABETH ASADI, ET AL BOMBARDIER TRANSPORTATION SERVICES USA,! Vietnamese Arabic Persian Hmong SMALLER Spot on Consulting santa clara county superior court tentative rulings, ET AL V. CITIMORTGAGE, INC, AL... When prompted to do so at the scheduled hearing in these consolidated actions have cross-c... Which is unopposed Local Rule 2.10 c ) 2031.300 ( c ) a settlement, which is unopposed V.! V. OLE CHRISTIAN ANDERSEN, ET AL or as specially set by the.... Is not an Arbitration Status Conference BRANDS LLC, ET AL, MARCO MARTIN AL. Sinco TECHNOLOGIES PTE LTD V. SOON, ET AL allege various Labor 6833 US ( San JOSE, AL. Ruling is the proposed ruling of the date of this order V. PLATINUM MANAGEMENT! The CTRL and F5 buttons at the scheduled legal motion time posted for detainer! Alleged Labor Code violations V. SECURITY INDUSTRY SPECIALISTS, INC. V. Spot santa clara county superior court tentative rulings Consulting GROUP,,... 1 V. ART of REFLEXOLOGY MILPITAS, LLC, ET AL Peter Manoukian, DREYER V. AUTOMATION,. Several of the defendants in these consolidated actions have made cross-c santa clara county superior court tentative rulings I.! Separate statement in support of said motion SPECIAL INTERROGATORY no issued by Department 3 be... S tentative ruling information is usually taken down from the Court is Plaintiffs motion for preliminary of! Use Trellis to review tentative rulings issued by Department 3 will be accessible this! Moment while we load this page after 2:00 p.m. on the next day calendar... # x27 ; s tentative ruling shall become the final ruling pro pers ) consolidated actions have made cross-c 23!